1The episcopal palace of D—— adjoins the hospital.

2The episcopal palace was a huge and beautiful house, built of stone at the beginning of the last century by M. Henri Puget, Doctor of Theology of the Faculty of Paris, Abbé of Simore, who had been Bishop of D—— in 1712. This palace was a genuine seignorial residence. Everything about it had a grand air,—the apartments of the Bishop, the drawing-rooms, the chambers, the principal courtyard, which was very large, with walks encircling it under arcades in the old Florentine fashion, and gardens planted with magnificent trees. In the dining-room, a long and superb gallery which was situated on the ground floor and opened on the gardens, M. Henri Puget had entertained in state, on July 29, 1714, My Lords Charles Brûlart de Genlis, archbishop; Prince d’Embrun; Antoine de Mesgrigny, the capuchin, Bishop of Grasse; Philippe de Vendôme, Grand Prior of France, Abbé of Saint Honoré de Lérins; François de Berton de Crillon, bishop, Baron de Vence; César de Sabran de Forcalquier, bishop, Seignor of Glandève; and Jean Soanen, Priest of the Oratory, preacher in ordinary to the king, bishop, Seignor of Senez. The portraits of these seven reverend personages decorated this apartment; and this memorable date, the 29th of July, 1714, was there engraved in letters of gold on a table of white marble.

3The hospital was a low and narrow building of a single story, with a small garden.

4Three days after his arrival, the Bishop visited the hospital. The visit ended, he had the director requested to be so good as to come to his house.

5“Monsieur the director of the hospital,” said he to him, “how many sick people have you at the present moment?”

6“Twenty-six, Monseigneur.”

7“That was the number which I counted,” said the Bishop.

8“The beds,” pursued the director, “are very much crowded against each other.”

9“That is what I observed.”

10“The halls are nothing but rooms, and it is with difficulty that the air can be changed in them.”

11“So it seems to me.”

12“And then, when there is a ray of sun, the garden is very small for the convalescents.”

13“That was what I said to myself.”

14“In case of epidemics,—we have had the typhus fever this year; we had the sweating sickness two years ago, and a hundred patients at times,—we know not what to do.”

15“That is the thought which occurred to me.”

16“What would you have, Monseigneur?” said the director. “One must resign one’s self.”

17This conversation took place in the gallery dining-room on the ground floor.

18The Bishop remained silent for a moment; then he turned abruptly to the director of the hospital.

19“Monsieur,” said he, “how many beds do you think this hall alone would hold?”

20“Monseigneur’s dining-room?” exclaimed the stupefied director.

21The Bishop cast a glance round the apartment, and seemed to be taking measures and calculations with his eyes.

22“It would hold full twenty beds,” said he, as though speaking to himself. Then, raising his voice:—

23“Hold, Monsieur the director of the hospital, I will tell you something. There is evidently a mistake here. There are thirty-six of you, in five or six small rooms. There are three of us here, and we have room for sixty. There is some mistake, I tell you; you have my house, and I have yours. Give me back my house; you are at home here.”

24On the following day the thirty-six patients were installed in the Bishop’s palace, and the Bishop was settled in the hospital.

25M. Myriel had no property, his family having been ruined by the Revolution. His sister was in receipt of a yearly income of five hundred francs, which sufficed for her personal wants at the vicarage. M. Myriel received from the State, in his quality of bishop, a salary of fifteen thousand francs. On the very day when he took up his abode in the hospital, M. Myriel settled on the disposition of this sum once for all, in the following manner. We transcribe here a note made by his own hand:—

26NOTE ON THE REGULATION OF MY HOUSEHOLD EXPENSES.

27For the little seminary 1,500 livres

28Society of the mission 100 ”

29For the Lazarists of Montdidier 100 ”

30Seminary for foreign missions in Paris 200 ”

31Congregation of the Holy Spirit 150 ”

32Religious establishments of the Holy Land 100 ”

33Charitable maternity societies 300 ”

34Extra, for that of Arles 50 ”

35Work for the amelioration of prisons 400 ”

36Work for the relief and delivery of prisoners 500 ”

37To liberate fathers of families incarcerated for debt 1,000 ”

38Addition to the salary of the poor teachers of the diocese 2,000 ”

39Public granary of the Hautes-Alpes 100 ”

40Congregation of the ladies of D——, of Manosque, and of Sisteron,

41for the gratuitous instruction of poor girls 1,500 ”

42For the poor 6,000 ”

43My personal expenses 1,000 ”

44———

45Total 15,000 ”

46M. Myriel made no change in this arrangement during the entire period that he occupied the see of D—— As has been seen, he called it regulating his household expenses.

47This arrangement was accepted with absolute submission by Mademoiselle Baptistine. This holy woman regarded Monseigneur of D—— as at one and the same time her brother and her bishop, her friend according to the flesh and her superior according to the Church. She simply loved and venerated him. When he spoke, she bowed; when he acted, she yielded her adherence. Their only servant, Madame Magloire, grumbled a little. It will be observed that Monsieur the Bishop had reserved for himself only one thousand livres, which, added to the pension of Mademoiselle Baptistine, made fifteen hundred francs a year. On these fifteen hundred francs these two old women and the old man subsisted.

48And when a village curate came to D——, the Bishop still found means to entertain him, thanks to the severe economy of Madame Magloire, and to the intelligent administration of Mademoiselle Baptistine.

49One day, after he had been in D—— about three months, the Bishop said:—

50“And still I am quite cramped with it all!”

51“I should think so!” exclaimed Madame Magloire. “Monseigneur has not even claimed the allowance which the department owes him for the expense of his carriage in town, and for his journeys about the diocese. It was customary for bishops in former days.”

52“Hold!” cried the Bishop, “you are quite right, Madame Magloire.”

53And he made his demand.

54Some time afterwards the General Council took this demand under consideration, and voted him an annual sum of three thousand francs, under this heading: Allowance to M. the Bishop for expenses of carriage, expenses of posting, and expenses of pastoral visits.

55This provoked a great outcry among the local burgesses; and a senator of the Empire, a former member of the Council of the Five Hundred which favored the 18 Brumaire, and who was provided with a magnificent senatorial office in the vicinity of the town of D——, wrote to M. Bigot de Préameneu, the minister of public worship, a very angry and confidential note on the subject, from which we extract these authentic lines:—

56“Expenses of carriage? What can be done with it in a town of less than four thousand inhabitants? Expenses of journeys? What is the use of these trips, in the first place? Next, how can the posting be accomplished in these mountainous parts? There are no roads. No one travels otherwise than on horseback. Even the bridge between Durance and Château-Arnoux can barely support ox-teams. These priests are all thus, greedy and avaricious. This man played the good priest when he first came. Now he does like the rest; he must have a carriage and a posting-chaise, he must have luxuries, like the bishops of the olden days. Oh, all this priesthood! Things will not go well, M. le Comte, until the Emperor has freed us from these black-capped rascals. Down with the Pope! [Matters were getting embroiled with Rome.] For my part, I am for Cæsar alone.” Etc., etc.

57On the other hand, this affair afforded great delight to Madame Magloire. “Good,” said she to Mademoiselle Baptistine; “Monseigneur began with other people, but he has had to wind up with himself, after all. He has regulated all his charities. Now here are three thousand francs for us! At last!”

58That same evening the Bishop wrote out and handed to his sister a memorandum conceived in the following terms:—

59EXPENSES OF CARRIAGE AND CIRCUIT.

60For furnishing meat soup to the patients in the hospital 1,500 livres

61For the maternity charitable society of Aix 250 ”

62For the maternity charitable society of Draguignan 250 ”

63For foundlings 500 ”

64For orphans 500 ”

65——

66Total 3,000 ”

67Such was M. Myriel’s budget.

68As for the chance episcopal perquisites, the fees for marriage bans, dispensations, private baptisms, sermons, benedictions, of churches or chapels, marriages, etc., the Bishop levied them on the wealthy with all the more asperity, since he bestowed them on the needy.

69After a time, offerings of money flowed in. Those who had and those who lacked knocked at M. Myriel’s door,—the latter in search of the alms which the former came to deposit. In less than a year the Bishop had become the treasurer of all benevolence and the cashier of all those in distress. Considerable sums of money passed through his hands, but nothing could induce him to make any change whatever in his mode of life, or add anything superfluous to his bare necessities.

70Far from it. As there is always more wretchedness below than there is brotherhood above, all was given away, so to speak, before it was received. It was like water on dry soil; no matter how much money he received, he never had any. Then he stripped himself.

71The usage being that bishops shall announce their baptismal names at the head of their charges and their pastoral letters, the poor people of the country-side had selected, with a sort of affectionate instinct, among the names and prenomens of their bishop, that which had a meaning for them; and they never called him anything except Monseigneur Bienvenu [Welcome]. We will follow their example, and will also call him thus when we have occasion to name him. Moreover, this appellation pleased him.

72“I like that name,” said he. “Bienvenu makes up for the Monseigneur.”

73We do not claim that the portrait herewith presented is probable; we confine ourselves to stating that it resembles the original.